Materials Transactions Online

Materials Transactions, Vol.54 No.03 (2013) pp.308-313
© 2013 The Japan Institute of Metals

Identical Area Observations of Deformation-Induced Martensitic Transformation in SUS304 Austenitic Stainless Steel

Meichuan Chen, Daisuke Terada, Akinobu Shibata and Nobuhiro Tsuji

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

In this study, an identical area of a SUS304 austenitic stainless steel specimen was observed by electron backscattering diffraction measurements at different strains in tensile test at ambient temperature, in order to investigate the details of deformation-induced martensitic transformation. Firstly, a number of thin deformation twins were formed in austenite grains. Most of the martensite crystals were observed either near grain boundary triple junctions or inside the deformation twins. Secondly, it was found that martensite crystals preferentially appeared in the austenite grains whose <001> crystal directions were close to the tensile direction. Furthermore, when austenite grains had several martensite crystals inside, only one or two variants were observed among 24 variants possible under Kurdjumov-Sachs orientation relationship, which indicated the existence of variant selection rules. Patel and Cohen model and Bogers-Burgers model were examined to understand the variant selection, but both models could not explain the variant selections. The result suggests that complicated stress states govern the deformation-induced martensitic transformation in polycrystalline austenite.

(Received 2012/10/15; Accepted 2012/12/12; Published 2013/02/25)

Keywords: austenitic stainless steels, electron backscattering diffraction, deformation-induced martensitic transformation, identical area observation, variant selection

PDF(Free)PDF (Free) Table of ContentsTable of Contents

REFERENCES

  1. I. Tamura: Metall. Sci. 16 (1982) 245-253.
  2. G. B. Olson and M. Azrin: Metall. Trans. A 9 (1978) 713-721.
  3. G. B. Olson and M. Cohen: Metall. Trans. A 13 (1982) 1907-1914.
  4. T. Tsurui, S. Inoue, K. Matsuda, H. Ishigaki, K. Murata and K. Koterazawa: J. Soc. Mater. Sci. Japan 50 (2001) 1115-1119.
  5. M. Kato and T. Mori: Acta Metall. 24 (1976) 853-860.
  6. G. Stone and G. Thomas: Metall. Mater. Trans. B 5 (1974) 2095-2102.
  7. J. C. Bokros and E. R. Parker: Acta Metall. 11 (1963) 1291-1301.
  8. Y. F. Shen, X. X. Li, X. Sun, Y. D. Wang and L. Zuo: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 552 (2012) 514-522.
  9. G. B. Olson and M. Cohen: J. Less-Common Metals 28 (1972) 107-118.
  10. S. Morito, X. Huang, T. Furuhara, T. Maki and N. Hansen: Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 5323-5331.
  11. H. Kitahara, R. Ueji, N. Tsuji and Y. Minamino: Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 1279-1288.
  12. B. P. J. Sandivik and C. M. Wayman: Metall. Mater. Trans. A 14 (1983) 823-834.
  13. G. Miyamoto, N. Takayama and T. Furuhara: Scr. Mater. 60 (2009) 1113-1116.
  14. J. R. Patel and M. Cohen: Acta Metall. 1 (1953) 531-538.
  15. A. J. Bogers and W. G. Burgers: Acta Metall. 12 (1964) 255-261.
  16. J. S. Bowles and J. K. Mackenzie: Acta Metall. 2 (1954) 224-234.


[JIM HOME] [JOURNAL ARCHIVES]

© 2013 The Japan Institute of Metals
Comments to us : editjt@jim.or.jp