Materials Transactions Online

Materials Transactions, Vol.53 No.04 (2012) pp.631-635
© 2012 The Japanese Society for Non-Destructive Inspection

Investigation of the Sound Field of Phased Array Using the Photoelastic Visualization Technique and the Accurate FEM

Sho Washimori, Tsuyoshi Mihara and Hatsuzo Tashiro

Mechanical and Intellectual Systems Engineering, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-8555, Japan

In this study, we tried to obtain an accurate ultrasonic sound field of the commercial phased array system. For this purpose, the experimental photoelastic ultrasonic visualization system was improved to evaluate a phased array system and the analytical special large-scale finite element method (FEM) code for ultrasonic transmission was applied.

As the results, an actual sound field of phased array system was much more complicate than that of the conventional industrial assumption based on a simple superposition. One of the causes of the difference might be the accuracy of the directivity for each element in the array transducer. Thus, the combination of photoelastic visualization method and FEM analysis was useful for the accurate sound field investigation of the phased array measurement.

(Received 2009/11/10; Accepted 2011/10/29; Published 2012/03/25)

Keywords: sound field, phased array, photoelastic visualization, finite element method, directivity

PDF(Free)PDF (Free) Table of ContentsTable of Contents


  1. V. Lupien: Mater. Eval. 65 (2007) 24-32.
  2. Olympus NDT: Introduction to Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Applications, (Olympus NDT, Canada, 2006) pp. 9-21 (in Japanese).
  3. R. C. Wyatt: Non-destructive Testing 5 (1972) 354-358.
  4. K. Date and Y. Udagawa: 1988 Ultrasonics Symposium, (1988) pp. 1069-1073.
  5. K. Date and H. Shimada: J. JSNDI 36 (1987) 605-612 (in Japanese).
  6. K. G. Hall: Ultrasonics 20 (1982) 159-167.
  7. Y. Fujikake and K. Kawashima: J. JSNDI 36 (1987) 321-325 (in Japanese).
  8. E. Ginzel and D. Stewart: Proc. 16th World Conf. on NDT, (2004)
  9. B. Cugnet, A.-C. Hladky and J. Assaad: Ultrasonics 40 (2002) 503-506.
  10. L. Satyanarayan, C. Sridhar, C. V. Krishnamurthy and K. Balasubramaniam: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip. 84 (2007) 716-729.
  11. ComWAVE:
  12. A. R. Selfridge, G. S. Kino and B. T. Khuri-Yakub: Appl. Phys. Lett. 37 (1980) 35-36.
  13. A. C. Clay, S. C. Wooh, L. Azar and J. Y. Wang: J. Nondestruct. Eval. 18 (1999) 59-71.
  14. S. C. Wooh and Y. Shi: Wave Motion 29 (1999) 245-265.
  15. Y. H. Nam and K. Date: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 14, (Plenum publishing corporation, New York, 1995) pp. 1091-1098.
  16. Y. H. Nam: Weld. J. 78 (1999) 338-342.
  17. T. Mihara, K. Hagiwara and T. Furukawa: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1998) 3030-3034.
  18. K. Koketsu, H. Fujiwara and Y. Ikegami: Pure Appl. Geophys. 161 (2004) 2183-2198.
  19. D. K. Lemon and G. J. Posakony: Mater. Eval. 38 (1980) 34-37.


© 2012 The Japanese Society for Non-Destructive Inspection
Comments to us :