Materials Transactions Online

Materials Transactions, Vol.59 No.06 (2018) pp.950-956
© 2018 The Japan Society for Heat Treatment

Influence of Thermal Boundary Conditions on the Results of Heat Treatment Simulation

Tsuyoshi Sugimoto1, 2 and Dong-Ying Ju2

1Department of Material Engineering, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Atsugi 243-0192, Japan
2Department of Engineering, Saitama Institute of Technology, Fukaya 369-0293, Japan

Surface hardening heat treatment, including carburizing and quenching, is widely used to prevent wear and rolling contact fatigue of vehicle power transmission system parts such as gears. However, distortion that occurs during heat treatment processes can present problems for improving the precision of gear shapes. Predicting distortion behavior accurately by a heat treatment simulation method could help to achieve better heat treatment quality and accuracy of parts. A heat treatment simulation of a gear tooth was carried out in this work by using the heat transfer coefficient during a gear heat treatment process. The tooth surface was divided into nine parts with different heat transfer coefficients. It was found that the difference between the actual deformation and the calculated deformation was smaller compared with the application of a uniform heat transfer coefficient at the tooth surface. By considering the distribution of heat transfer coefficient on the tooth surface for width and height direction, the heat treatment deformation prediction result became more accurate.

[doi:10.2320/matertrans.H-M2018816]

(Received 2017/07/28; Accepted 2018/03/19; Published 2018/05/25)

Keywords: heat treatment simulation, heat transfer coefficient, heat treatment deformation, gear tooth

PDF(member)PDF (member) PDF(organization)PDF (organization) Order DocumentOrder Document Table of ContentsTable of Contents

REFERENCES

  1. Sachs K.: Metal Treat. Drop Forg. 28 (1961) 281-287.
  2. Inoue T. and Tanaka K.: Zairyou 22 (1973) 218-223.
  3. Arimoto K., Ikuta F. and Inoue T.: Netsushori 34 (1994) 332-338.
  4. Inokari H., Ki H., Morita K. and Shimokawachi H.: MHI Technical Report 35 (1998) 306-309.
  5. Ikuta F., Horino T. and Inoue T.T.: Zairyou 47 (1998) 892-898.
  6. K. Arimoto, D. Huang, D. Lambert and W.T. Wu: Proc. of the 20th ASM Heat Treating Society Conference, 1 (2000) 737-746.
  7. Okamura K.: Welding Engineering 72 (2003) 603.
  8. Inoue T. and Morimoto Y.: Zairyou 52 (2003) 1192-1197.
  9. Ooki C.: NTN Technical Review 69 (2001) 61-68.
  10. K. Arimoto: Heat Treatment Deformation and Residual Stress, http://www.arimotech.com/documents/heat_treating_distortion_and_residual_stresses-i-2011-9-5.pdf.
  11. M. Nabekura, M. Hashitani, Y. Nishimura, F. Fujita, Y. Yanase and M. Misaki: Gear Cutting and Grinding Machines and Precision Cutting Tools Developed for Gear Manufacturing for Automobile Transmissions, Mitsubishi Heavy Industry Technical Report, 43 (2006) 41-47.
  12. K. Kizawa: Analysis of Distortion Mechanism of Rolling Bearing Rings in Normal Quenching and Carburized Quenching.
  13. Arimoto K. and Narazaki M.: Netsushori 42 (2002) 346-352.
  14. Arimoto K., Ikuta F., Horino T., Tamura S., Narazaki M. and Mikita Y.: Trans. Mater. Heat Treat. 25 (2004) 486-493.
  15. Uchida F., Gotou M., Shincou R. and Nagata S.: Casting Engineering 77 (2005) 437-444.
  16. Narazaki M.: NACHI TECHNICAL REPORT 15 A1 (2008) 1-12.
  17. T. Sugimoto and Y. Watanabe: The Reports of 60th Japanese Heat Treatment Society Conference, (2005) 3-4.


[JIM HOME] [JOURNAL ARCHIVES]

© 2018 The Japan Society for Heat Treatment
Comments to us : editjt@jim.or.jp