Materials Transactions Online

Materials Transactions, Vol.58 No.04 (2017) pp.606-612
© 2017 The Japan Institute of Metals and Materials

Effect of Dissolved Impurities on the Lightness and Surface Morphology of Nickel Deposits from Chloride Electrowinning Solutions

Yuki Sato1, Satoshi Oue2, Shinichi Heguri1, 3 and Hiroaki Nakano2

1Department of Materials Process Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
2Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
3Niihama Research Laboratories, Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,LTD., Ehime 792-0002, Japan

This study investigated the effect of dissolved impurities on the lightness, surface morphology, and current efficiency of deposited nickel during electrowinning. Nickel electrodeposition was performed at a current density of 300 A·m−2 and 7.2 × 105 C·m−2 of charge in an unagitated chloride solution containing Mn2+, Cr3+, and SO42− ion impurities with a pH from 1 to 3, at a temperature of 333 K. Solutions containing 10 g·dm−3 of Mn2+ resulted in a slight decrease in current efficiency for nickel deposition and smaller crystal sizes in the deposited nickel. The lightness of deposited nickel decreased for Mn2+ concentrations exceeding 1 g·dm−3. When nickel deposition was performed using a soluble nickel anode to prevent the formation of MnO2 at the anode, greater nickel lightness resulted than with an insoluble anode, suggesting that MnO2 produced by the insoluble anode caused decreased lightness of nickel. In solutions containing Cr3+, the current efficiency of nickel gradually decreased with increasing Cr3+ concentrations and significantly decreased at Cr3+ concentrations above 0.1 g·dm−3. The lightness of deposited Ni greatly decreased with increasing concentrations of Cr3+ above 0.001 g·dm−3. Formation of Cr(OH)3 at the cathode layer is presumed to suppress nickel deposition, resulting in some codeposition of NiO and Ni(OH)2 along with Ni, which causes the nickel current efficiency and lightness to decrease. Conversely, solutions containing SO42− resulted in a moderate decrease in nickel current efficiency at SO42− concentrations above 50 g·dm−3 and a significant decrease above 100 g·dm−3. The lightness of deposited nickel increased slightly at SO42− concentrations of 20 g·dm−3 and strongly increased above 20 g·dm−3. Because the overpotential for nickel deposition increases with the concentration of SO42−, the surface of the deposited nickel becomes smooth, resulting in greater lightness.

This Paper was Originally Published in Japanese in J. Japan Inst. Met. Mater. 80 (2016) 539-545.


(Received 2016/12/13; Accepted 2017/01/20; Published 2017/03/25)

Keywords: electrodeposition, electrowinning, nickel, lightness of deposits, morphology, chloride solution, impurity, current efficiency, polarization

PDF(member)PDF (member) PDF(organization)PDF (organization) Order DocumentOrder Document Table of ContentsTable of Contents


  1. M. Holm and T.J. O'KEEFE: Minerals Engineering 13 (2000) 193-204.
  2. J. Lu, Q. Yang and Z. Zhang: Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 20 (2010) s97-s101.
  3. J. Ji, W.C. Cooper, D.B. Dreisinger and E. Peters: J. Appl. Electrochem. 25 (1995) 642-650.
  4. W.A. Wesley and J.W. Carey: Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 75 (1939) 209-236.
  5. H. Ise: Denchu Gizyutsu to Ouyo, (Maki shoten, Tokyo, 1996) pp.74-75.
  6. M. Kawasaki and H. Enomoto: Mekki Kyohon, (Nikkan Kogyo Shinbunsya, Tokyo, 1988) pp.79-89.
  7. R. Takahashi, Y. Sato, S. Oue, S. Heguri and H. Nakano: Mater. Trans. 56 (2015) 1199-1206.
  8. R. Takahashi, Y. Sato, S. Oue, S. Heguri and H. Nakano: J. Jpn. Inst. Metals 78 (2014) 427-433.
  9. K.S. Willson and J.A. Rogers: Tech. Proc. Amer. Electroplaters Soc. 51 (1964) 92-95.
  10. T. Watanabe: J. Surf. Finish. Soc. Jpn. 40 (1989) 280-286.
  11. R. Winand: J. Appl. Electrochem. 21 (1991) 377-385.
  12. M. Pourbaix: Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria, (Pergamon Press, New York, 1966) p.262, 333.
  13. J.O'M. Bockris and H. Kita: J. Electrochem. Soc. 108 (1961) 676-685.
  14. H. Nakano, S. Kobayashi, T. Akiyama, T. Tsuru and H. Fukushima: Tetsu-to-Hagané 89 (2003) 64-70.
  15. H. Nakano, M. Matsuno, S. Oue, M. Yano, S. Kobayashi and H. Fukushima: J. Jpn. Inst. Metals 69 (2005) 548-554.
  16. M. Yasuda, I. Ohno and S. Haruyama: J. Surf. Finish. Soc. Jpn. 41 (1990) 312-317.
  17. S. Haruyama: Hakumaku Zairyo no Kiso to Ohyo, (Jpn. Inst. Met., Sendai, 1987) P.37.
  18. N.A. Pangarov: J. Electroanal. Chem. 9 (1965) 70-83.
  19. N.A. Pangarov: Electrochim. Acta 7 (1962) 139-146.


© 2017 The Japan Institute of Metals and Materials
Comments to us :