Materials Transactions Online

Materials Transactions, Vol.47 No.01 (2006) pp.96-100
© 2006 The Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity

Effect of Stress Concentration on Upper Yield Point in Mild Steel

Hong-Bing Sun1,, Yuya Kaneda1,, Masanobu Ohmori2 and Fusahito Yoshida1

1Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hiroshima Kokusai Gakuin University, Hiroshima 739-0321, Japan

The effect of stress concentration on the upper yield stress was investigated for an annealed mild steel wire by performing uniaxial tension tests. In order to avoid such a situation that initial yielding occurs at the specimen-clamping ends due to stress concentration, a non-uniform annealing method (the annealing temperature was the highest at the center of the specimen) was employed. For a non-uniformly annealed specimen the upper yield stress was almost twofold of the lower yield stress. In contrast, for a uniformly annealed specimen, the difference between the upper and lower yield stresses was not so considerably high, because the site of clamping-induced plastic pre-strain played a role of starting point of yielding. To examine the effect of stress concentration on the upper-yield point phenomena, FE simulation of the uniaxial tension tests was conducted using a viscoplastic constitutive model proposed by one of the authors (F. Yoshida, Int. J. Plasticity 16 (2000) 359). The results of numerical simulation were in good agreement with the experimental observations. From the results of the experiments and the numerical simulation, it is concluded that, although a material element itself possesses considerably high upper-yield stress, the observed one in ordinal uniaxial tension experiment is generally not so high because of the stress concentration.

(Received 2004/12/27; Accepted 2005/10/20; Published 2006/1/15)

Keywords: stress concentration, upper yield point, Lüders band, viscoplastic constitutive model, FE model, plastic strain, lower yield strength

PDF(Free)PDF (Free) Table of ContentsTable of Contents

REFERENCES

  1. J. G. Docherty and F. W. Thorne: Engineering 132 (1931) 295--297.
  2. W. Sylwestrowicz and E. O. Hall: Proc. Phys. Soc. 64B (1951) 495--501.
  3. H. B. Sun, F. Yoshida, X. Ma, T. Kamei and M. Ohmori: Mater. Lett. 57 (2003) 3206--3210.
  4. M. M. Hutchison: J. Iron Steel Inst. 186 (1957) 431--432.
  5. F. Yoshida: Int. J. Plasticity 16 (2000) 359--380.
  6. G. T. Hahn: Acta Metal. 10 (1962) 727--738.
  7. D. Hull and D. J. Bacon: Introduction to Dislocations, 3rd Edition, (Pergamon Press, 1984) pp.~224--233.
  8. Y. Kohda: Introduction to Metal Physics (Corona Publ. Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 1973) pp.~334.
  9. M. Itoh, F. Yoshida, Y. Yamahita and M. Ohmori: JSME Int. J., Ser. I 35 (1992) 191--200.
  10. H. Tsukahara: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 248 (1998) 304--308.
  11. S. Kyriakides: Proc. Int. Symp. on Materials Science for the 21st Century (The Japan Society of Material Science, 2001), Vol.~A, pp.~316--325.


[JIM HOME] [JOURNAL ARCHIVES]

© 2002 The Japan Institute of Metals
Comments to us : editjt@jim.or.jp